![]() Yes, games are coming out and don't have names: but it's not that important to have a huge list of untitled games. What's everyone else's thoughts on the matter? - Digiwrld1 02:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Reply Future Projects Section ĭoes this need to exist? The section is one long bulleted and cluttered list. On the flip side, the less stuff that is contained in the list, the more presentable it becomes. Battlefield: Bad Company or Wii Shooting. The reason for this being that the source links were implemented to deter vandalism and speculation, and if we require it only for those games whose articles have yet to be created, then people may abuse it and put rumored games/other platform games that already have a Wikipedia article on here without giving a source (i.e. I can understand that the idea for putting the reference link in the game article itself if it exists, but I'm in favor of moving the link only after the game has been released. I've also removed the reference link for those games that have already been released and have an article. I still feel that it can be improved even further, so if anyone else would like to work on it please feel free to. I've updated the introduction as per the above comments, moving the notes to editors to the Talk Page and emulating the N64 introduction here as well. Digiwrld1 13:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC) Reply Improvements Based Upon CVG Assessment I personally think that the sortable lists are a huge step up from what we had previously, but I look forward to seeing the opinions of other Wikipedia users. I've taken the liberty to request an assessment of this list from WikiProject: Nintendo and a re-rating from the CVG Portal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |